Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author.Makhabu, Shimane W.
dc.contributor.authorSkarpe, Christina
dc.contributor.authorHytteborn, Håkan
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T08:09:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-15T09:22:50Z
dc.date.available2019-03-13T08:09:31Z
dc.date.available2021-03-15T09:22:50Z
dc.date.issued2006-10
dc.identifier.citationMakhabu, S. W., Skarpe, C., & Hytteborn, H. (2006). Elephant impact on shoot distribution on trees and on rebrowsing by smaller browsers. Acta oecologica, 30(2), 136-146.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1873-6238
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X06000294
dc.identifier.urihttp://moodle.buan.ac.bw:80/handle/123456789/132
dc.descriptionCopyright checked on Sherpa Romeo on 13 March 2019 indicate that author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). Author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF. Author's post-print on open access repository after an embargo period of between 12 months and 48 months. Permitted deposit due to Funding Body, Institutional and Governmental policy or mandate, may be required to comply with embargo periods of 12 months to 48 months. Must link to publisher version with DOI. Author's post-print must be released with a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licenseen_US
dc.description.abstractIn order to determine the effects of a megaherbivore, the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) on browse available for mesoherbivores, we assessed the vertical distribution of shoots (< 6 mm in diameter) on trees with different accumulated elephant impact. We also determined the foraging responses by a mixed feeder, impala (Aepyceros melampus) and a browser, greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) which are mesoherbivores. The foraging responses by impala and kudu were in terms of preferences of trees with different accumulated elephant impact levels and whether animals browsed in different height sections in proportion to availability of shoots. We counted shoots in each 20 cm height section up to 2.6 m on trees in 25 m by 25 m plots and on trees observed to be browsed by impala and kudu. In most tree species, individuals with high accumulated elephant impact were shorter and had more shoots at low levels than tree individuals with either low or no accumulated elephant impact. Impala and kudu preferred to browse tree individuals with accumulated elephant impact over those without such impact. Impala and kudu browsed more than expected at height sections with many shoots and less than expected at height sections with fewer shoots indicating a non-linear overmatching foraging response. We suggest that increased shoot abundance at low levels in the canopy might explain part of the observed preferences. Elephants, therefore, seem to facilitate browsing by mesoherbivores by generating ‘browsing lawns’. Such benefits need to be considered when making decisions on how to manage populations of megaherbivores like elepen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElservieren_US
dc.subjectAccumulated elephant impacten_US
dc.subjectChobe Riverfronten_US
dc.subjectImpalaen_US
dc.subjectKuduen_US
dc.titleElephant impact on shoot distribution on trees and on rebrowsing by smaller browsersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record